Books and Reviews | McInerny Release!

Posted on October 18, 2006 by David Mendez.
Categories: Books and Reviews, Thomism, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Theology.

Here is where the Birthday ideas come: Ralph McInerny just released this great piece of work titled “Praeambule Fidei” which basicaly means Steps Before Faith. Here are the details below

THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS
PRAEAMBULA FIDEI

Thomism and the God of the Philosophers
Ralph McInerny
Paper ISBN 0-8132-1458-0, $34.95
313 pages

Publication date: October 18, 2006
Book News for Immediate Release

The Catholic University of America Press announces publication of Ralph McInerny’s newest work, Praeambula Fidei: Thomism and the God of the Philosophers. The praeambula fidei (”preambles of faith”) are regarded by Thomas Aquinas as the culmination of philosophy: natural theology, the highest knowledge of God that is possible on philosophical grounds alone. The natural home for such considerations is the Metaphysics of Aristotle and Thomas’s commentary on that work. Yet Thomas’s view has been cast into doubt, with philosophers and theologians alike attempting to drive a wedge between Aquinas and Aristotle. In this book, renowned philosopher Ralph McInerny sets out to review what Thomas meant by the phrase and to defend a robust understanding of Thomas’s teaching on the subject. After setting forth different attitudes toward proofs of God’s existence and outlining the difference between belief and knowledge, McInerny examines the texts in which Thomas uses and explains the phrase “preambles of faith.” He then turns his attention to the work of eminent twentieth-century Thomists and chronicles their abandonment of the preambles. He draws a contrast between this form of Thomism and that of the classical Dominican commentators, notably Cajetan, arguing that part of the abandonment of the notion of the preambles as philosophical involves a misreading and misrepresentation of Cajetan. McInerny concludes with a positive rereading of Aristotle’s Metaphysics and Aquinas’s use thereof. In the end, the book argues for a return to the notion of Aristotelico-Thomism–Thomistic philosophy as the organic development of the thought of Aristotle.

Ralph McInerny is Michael P. Grace Professor of Medieval Studies in the department of philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is cofounder of Crisis magazine and author of several books published by CUA Press, namely, the bestselling Ethica Thomistica, The Question of Christian Ethics, Aquinas on Human Action, and Boethius and Aquinas.

For more information, contact Beth Benevides, Marketing Manager
(202) 319-5052 or email benevides@cua.edu
CONTENTS:

Preface

PART I: The Preambles of Faith
1. Introduction

PART II: The Erosion of the Doctrine
Prologue
2. Gilson’s Attack on Cajetan
3. De Lubac and Cajetan
4. Christian Philosophy
5. The Chenu Case
6. The Alleged Forgetfulness of Esse

PART III: Thomism and Philosophical Theology
Prologue
7. The Presuppostions of Metaphysics
8. The Science We Are Seeking
9. The Metaphysics as a Literary Whole
10. Methodological Interlude
11. The Book of Wisdom
12. Sed Contra
13. Aristotelian Existentialism and Thomistic Essentialism
Selected Bibliography

Index

No Tag

What’s What - Most important Philosophy of Religion Articles

Mathew Mullins over at Prosblogion started a neat little list of must read articles in the last 50 years. He says:

“The project is to answer the following question. “What are the most important philosophy of religion articles published since 1950? I know there were many influential books written during this period, but that’s a list for another day. I’ve answered only for the period 1950-1979 but I’d like to extend this list up trough the 90’s. I’m interested to see what other people would add or subtract from the list. The list is below the fold.”

Very intersting list indeed. Personally, Quine, Alston, Nielson and especially Kretzmann are of great interest. Here is the list folks and see if any of you would like to help this list out.

1950s
JL Mackie, Evil and Omnipotence, 1955
JJC Smart, The Existence of God, 1955
Majid Fakry, The Classical Islamic Arguments for the Existence of God, 1957
Nicholas Rescher, The Ontological Proof Revisited, 1959
Jaakko Hintikka, On the Logic of the Ontological Argument, 1969
GEM Anscombe, Modern Moral Philosophy, 1958

1960s
William Alston, The Ontological Argument Revisited, 1960
Norman Malcolm, Anselm’s Ontological Arguments, 1960
Jan Berg, An Examination of the Ontological Proof, 1961
George Mavrodes, Some Puzzles Concerning Omnipotence, 1963
Frederick Fitch, The Perfection of Perfection, 1963
George Schlesinger, The Problem of Evil and the Problem of Suffering, 1964
Michael Dummett, Bringing About the Past, 1964
Nelson Pike, Divine Omniscience and Voluntary Action, 1965
Alvin Plantinga, The Free Will Defense, 1965
Haig Khatchadourian, God, Happiness and Evil, 1966
Kai Nielsen, Wittgensteinian Fideism, 1967
Marilyn Adams, Is the Existence of God a ‘Hard’ Fact?, 1967
Roderick Chisholm, The Defeat of Good and Evil, 1968
Nelson Pike, Omnipotence and God’s Ability to Sin, 1969
D Bennett, The Divine Simplicity, 1969
Anthony Kenny. Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom, 1969

1970s
David Lewis, Anselm and Actuality, 1970
William Mann, The Ontological Presuppositions of the Ontological argument, 1972
Ian Hacking, The Logic of Pascal’s Wager, 1972
Robert Adams, Must God Create the Best?, 1972
Antony Flew, The Presumption of Atheism, 1972
Robert Adams, A Modified Divine Command Conception of Ethical Wrongness, 1973
G. Stanley Kane, The Failure of Soul-Making Theodicy, 1975
Robin Attfield, The God of Religion and the God of Philosophy, 1975
William Rowe, The Ontological Argument and Question-Begging, 1976
Bruce Reichenbach, Natural Evils and Natural Law: A Theodicy for Natural Evils, 1976
Norman Malcolm, The Groundlessness of Belief, 1977
Peter van Inwagen, Ontological Arguments, 1977
Richard LaCroix, Augustine on the Simplicity of God, 1977
Robert Adams, Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil, 1977
Richard Swinburne, Natural Evils, 1978
Peter van Inwagen, The Possibility of Resurrection, 1978
Robert Adams, Existence, Self-Interest, and the Problem of Evil, 1979
Robert Adams, Moral Arguments for Theistic Belief, 1979
William Wainwright, Augustine on God’s Simplicity: A Reply, 1979
William Rowe, The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism, 1979
Joshua Hoffman, Can God Do Evil?, 1979
Alvin Plantinga, The Probabilistic Argument from Evil, 1979
Philip Quinn, Divine Command Ethics: A Causal Theory, 1979

1980s
Norman Kretzmann & Eleonore Stump, Eternity, 1981
Alvin Plantinga, Is Belief in God Properly Basic?, 1981
Theodore Guleserian, God and Possible Worlds: The Modal Problem of Evil, 1983
Norman Kretzmann & Isaac Abraham, Euthyphro: God and the Basis of Morality, 1983
William Alston, Perceiving God, 1986
Peter van Inwagen, The Place of Chance in a World Sustained by God, 1988
Peter van Inwagen, The Magnitude, Duration and Distribution of Evil, 1988
Marilyn Adams, Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God, 1989
Paul Draper, Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for Theists, 1989

1990s
William Alston, Some Suggestions for Divine Command Theorists, 1990
Peter van Inwagen, The Problem of Evil, the Problem of Air, and the Problem of Silence, 1991

2000s
David Lewis, Evil for Freedom’s Sake?, 2000
Lynne Rudder Baker, Why Christians Should Not be Libertarians: An Augustinian Challenge, 2003
Linda Zagzebski, Omniscience and the Arrow of Time, 2002

No Tag

Apologetics | How do I know Christianity is True?

Posted on October 12, 2006 by David Mendez.
Categories: Things of Interest, Worldviews, Religion, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Theology.

JP Moreland By J P Moreland: James Porter Moreland (born 1948), commonly referred to as J.P. Moreland, is an American philosopher, theologian, and Christian apologist.

Dr. Moreland is a prolific author, lecturer, and debater on a wide range of philosophical, religious, and social issues. He is best known for his contributions to contemporary philosophical apologetics, his critiques of materialism and naturalism, and his defense of Christian theism. Moreland also serves as fellow of the Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture which is considered the hub of the intelligent design movement.

Moreland is currently distinguished professor of philosophy at Talbot School of Theology at Biola University in La Mirada, California. He received a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Southern California, an M.A. in philosophy from the University of California, Riverside, a Th.M. from Dallas Theological Seminary, and a Bachelor of Science degree in physical chemistry from the University of Missouri.
[edit]

Books

He has authored or co-authored numerous publications including:

* Scaling the Secular City: A Defense of Christianity
* Body and Soul: Human Nature and the Crisis of Ethics
* Christianity and the Nature of Science: A Philosophical Examination
* The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence for An Intelligent Designer
* Does God Exist? (with Kai Nielsen)
* Naturalism: A Critical Analysis
* Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview (with William Lane Craig)
* Love Your God With All Your Mind
* Lost Virtue of Happiness

From BeThinking.org Click to Listen

No Tag

Apologetics | Dr. Ravi Zacharias

Posted on October 2, 2006 by David Mendez.
Categories: Events, Worldviews, Things of Interest, Philosophy.

This would be a sample of the kind of apologetic material that you could hear from Dr. Ravi at this November’s Apologetic Conference in Charlotte NC.

Click the play symbol:

Ravi Zacharias

Communicating the Truth
MESSAGE 4: Flirting with the Truth

Text: Acts 24

Synopsis: The Apostle Paul stands before Felix, and with gentleness and persuasion, brings Felix to common ground and shares the power of the Gospel. Likewise, our challenge is to notice the points of contact we still have in our cultures so that we may effectively communicate the truth of Christ.
Introduction

Historical background of Acts 24

Paul is a model because he had both theological integrity and methodological genius.
I. Paul found common ground in a point of reference

A. The four stages of effective communication

B. The moral argument as common ground
II. Paul moves from a point of reference to a point of relevance

A. The point of relevance for Felix

B. What is the point of relevance in our time?
III. Paul moves from a point of relevance to a point of disturbance

A. The point of disturbance for Felix

B. Why does Paul follow this method?
IV. Three applications for today

© Dr Ravi Zacharias 2003

No Tag