News Release: Immigration from a Theological Perspective

The following press release was distributed today. Please let me know if you have any questions. I appreciate your support in helping us spread the word about this timely discussion.

http://www.udallas.edu/advancement/pr.cfm?NewsArticleID=2824&Cat=PR

UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS SCHOOL OF MINISTRY TO EXAMINE IMMIGRATION FROM A THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

Panel Discussion To Include Local Leaders From Journalism, Academia and Ministry

(IRVING, Texas – October 11, 2007) – The School of Ministry (SOM) at the University of Dallas (UD) will present a panel discussion titled “Theological Perspectives on Immigration” on Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2007, at 7 p.m. in UD’s Haggerty Art History Building.  Designed as a theological reflection on the issues, the SOM hopes to make a positive contribution to this important public policy debate by featuring local leaders from the fields of journalism, academia and ministry.

“By examining such a controversial and challenging issue from a theological perspective, we hope to take the immigration debate to a higher level of analysis,” said  Dr. Brian Schmisek, Dean of the SOM.  “Our panel includes a diverse mix of leaders in the Metroplex, including accomplished scholars, social commentators and service providers who work with immigrants.  I am confident that the exchange of ideas will be both intellectually stimulating and inspirational.”

The conversation will be moderated by William McKenzie, editorial columnist for The Dallas Morning News, who has written about immigration issues and called for theologians to discuss the balance between respect for the law and the biblical order to welcome strangers. 

McKenzie will be joined by several leaders in the local theological community, including:

• Dr. John Norris of UD’s Department of Theology.  The former chair of the Department of Theology and past director of UD’s signature Rome Study Abroad Program, he offers expertise on historical theology, patristics, patristic exegesis and St. Augustine.

• Professor María Pía Septién Ramírez of UD’s SOM.  Born and raised in Mexico City, her academic interests include biblical studies and Catholic outreach to the Hispanic community.  Additionally, she has played a leading role in the offering of SOM courses in both English and Spanish.

• Reverend Owen K. Ross, founding pastor of La Fundicion de Cristo/Christ's Foundry.  Prior to establishing his current ministry, he has worked in Ecuador with the United States Peace Corps and studied in Zimbabwe.  He is also an ordained elder in the United Methodist Church.

• Sister Nancy Sullivan, Director of Mission Awareness/Justice and Peace for the Diocese of Dallas.  As a teacher, social services administrator and advocate, she has served disadvantaged populations – including large numbers of immigrants – in the United States and abroad for more than fifty years.   

About the School of Ministry (SOM)
The University of Dallas School of Ministry (formerly the Institute for Religious and Pastoral Studies) celebrated its 20th anniversary this year and is one of the fastest growing graduate schools in its field in the U.S.  The School of Ministry is widely recognized as an important center for learning theology, developing pastoral skills, and fostering spiritual growth. The School has assembled an impressive international faculty, formed strong working relationships with dioceses in the region, and developed master’s degree and certificate programs that deliver outstanding educational experiences through classroom and online instruction.
The School of Ministry meets the educational needs of more than 800 students through five strategic areas of focus: its flagship master’s degree programs that include a Summer in Rome study program; the largest Catholic Biblical School of its kind among all Catholic universities nationwide; deacon formation programs and adult faith formation programs at the parish level; and an annual ministry conference. It is a member of the Association of Graduate Programs in Ministry and the Association for Clinical Pastoral Education. For more information about the School of Ministry, visit www.udallas.edu/ministry.

About the University of Dallas
The University of Dallas, a highly regarded, nationally recognized private university, celebrated its 50-year anniversary in 2006. With more than 3,000 students, the University offers undergraduate and graduate programs in the liberal arts, sciences and business. The University of Dallas has its main campus in Irving, Texas (1845 E. Northgate Drive), along with an international campus near Rome, Italy, and satellite campuses in North Richland Hills (Tarrant County) and Frisco, Texas. For more information about the University of Dallas, go to www.udallas.edu.

Digg It!

no comments yet.

Lee: Strange Fire on Defiled Altars

This article speaks for itself. Just like the Piper video I posted some time ago, this editorial piece by Lee Grady is finally making headway in what has been one of the worst times of spiritual abuse and charlatanry in the church today. Although I do not always agree with Charisma magazine, Lee Gady has done an outstanding job of pointing out these false prophets of our times.

Coming from a hispanic and pentecostal heritage myself, for too long I have endured the theological free loaders that have lived off of innocence of the somewhat doctrinaly anemic brothers and sisters who are taken adavntage of time and time again. I can personlly attest to times when people like Paulino Bernal would preach about the "five desires" where you can literally buy your desires from God. There have been times where I have spoken to pastors across the border where they have literally turned over their personal items and sometimes even deeds to their land in order to get these and many other health and wealth assurances.

I applaud Lee Grady and the many others who boldly point out these people that do more damage than good. The excerpt from his editorial piece is below.

"That’s why I fear for many of the men and women who claim to be God’s mouthpieces today, particularly in the charismatic/Pentecostal movement that I serve.

When I read Leviticus 10, I wonder why the ground has not opened up and swallowed some of the careless spiritual clowns who are masquerading as bishops, apostles and prophets.

A case in point: Bishop Thomas Wesley Weeks III, who is now facing charges of assaulting his wife, recently stood in his pulpit in Atlanta during a marriage conference and proceeded to teach married couples how to use profanity during sex.

Yes, the man who allegedly kicked and punched Juanita Bynum in a hotel parking lot last month told attendees at a “Teach Me How to Love You” event that they should get over their hang-ups about cussing. The bedroom, he said, is the place to get down and dirty.

“Don’t bring your salvation into the bedroom,” he said in a sermon segment that has been posted on YouTube.

“All those special words that you can’t say no more because you’re saved … save that for the bedroom!”

It is bad enough that Weeks told his followers that it’s OK to use filthy language with your wife during lovemaking. It’s worse that he said these things as a minister speaking from a pulpit during a church service. Thankfully he didn’t bring a bed on stage and give a demonstration—but now that he has taken pulpit crudity to a new level, someone else is sure to introduce Pentecostal porn to an audience somewhere.

Weeks’ comments didn’t surprise me. There are so many crazy things happening in pulpits in this country that I’ve become numb to their impact. It seems that in many segments of the church today, false prophets and backslidden preachers can introduce the most bizarre doctrines imaginable and still get shouts from the crowd and plenty of donations in the offering plate.

Meanwhile, a growing number of television preachers are resorting to the most inane tactics to raise money. A popular trend this year is the “Day of Atonement Offering”—in which Old Testament scriptures are strained to the breaking point to make a case for buying special blessings from God. Thanks to this “revelation,” you can click on a Web site icon and give your Day of Atonement Offering to win divine favor. (And of course every dime of that money goes to an evangelist who uses it to purchase houses, cars, plastic surgeries and more airtime so they can spread this nonsense to more naïve people.)

I have no personal vendetta against these spiritual hoodlums, but lately I find myself praying: “Lord, when will You clean up Your church? When will you send Your holy fire into the sanctuary? When will You turn over the tables of the moneychangers and drive the charlatans out of Your house?”

Digg It!

1 comment.

Espanol | Resumen Apologetico

Este sería un ejemplo de un resumen apologético el cual podría sostener una defensa de la existencia de Dios, la realidad de Jesucristo y los argumentos a veces lanzado hacia el uso de las evidencias cristianas (apologética) misma.

Resumen Apologético

 

I. El Argumento Apologético

a. La verdad acerca de la realidad es conocida.

b. Los opuestos no pueden ser verdaderos.

c. Dios existe.

d. Los milagros son posibles.

e. Los milagros realizados en conexión con una afirmación de la verdad son actos de Dios para confirmar la verdad de Dios a través de un mensajero de Dios.

f. Los documentos del Nuevo Testamento son confiables.

g. Como el Nuevo Testamento lo testifica, Jesús afirmo ser Dios.

h. La afirmación de Jesús respecto a su divinidad fue probada por una convergencia única de milagros.

i. Por lo tanto, Jesús fue Dios en carne humana.

j. Todo lo que Jesús (quien es Dios) afirmo como verdadero, es verdad.

k. Jesús afirmo que la Biblia es la Palabra de Dios.

l. Por lo tanto, es verdad que la Biblia es la Palabra de Dios y todo lo que es opuesto a cualquier verdad bíblica es falso.

II. La Necesidad Apologética

 a. Dios lo manda 1era Pedro 3:15; 2ª Cor. 10:5; Fil. 1:7; Jud 3; Tito 1:9

 b. La Razón la Exige – Gn. 1:27; Col. 3:10).

 i. Es por el razonamiento que somos diferenciados de los animales irracionales.

 ii. Sócrates dijo, “la vida no examinada no es digna de vivir.” También se podría decir que la fe no examinada no debe ser creída.

 c. El Mundo la Necesita

 III. Objeciones a la Apologética

 a. Objeciones desde el punto de vista bíblico

 i. La Biblia no necesita ser defendida (E.g., Biblia como León)

 ii. Dios no puede ser conocido por la razón humana.

 iii. La naturaleza humana no puede entenderlo.

 iv. Sin fe es imposible agradar a Dios.

 v. Jesús rechazo dar señales a los hombres impíos.

 vi. No le contestes al necio con su necedad.

 vii. La Apologética no es usada en la Biblia.

 b. Objeciones a la Apologética afuera de la Biblia

 i. La lógica no puede decirnos nada acerca de Dios.

 ii. La lógica no puede “probar” la existencia de algo.

 iii. La lógica es inútil en asuntos religiosos.

iv. No puedes probar por la razón de que Dios existe.

No Tag

Digg It!

no comments yet.

Puerto Rico Watch out! …Its a Hurricane, Its a Typhoon - no, its Jose Luis de Jesus and it’s Judgement Day!

It seems that Jose de Jesus is bringing Judgment to Puerto Rico. As I have said before, he sure has an angle on marketing techniques that put many a cult leaders to shame. This announcement was found on his website:

Jesucristo hombre, Dr. José Luis de Jesús Miranda, el juez de todos, viene a traer justicia a Puerto Rico, desenmascarando la maldad del sistema religioso corrupto y declarando justos a sus escogidos.

Este 17 de diciembre, el mundo será testigo de la segunda venida de Cristo. El Rey de Reyes llega a suelo boricua. Puerto Rico será el escenario donde cientos de personas presenciarán en vivo, mientras millones sintonizarán vía satélite, el evento que marcará el rumbo de la historia.

Te invitamos a corroborar las evidencias de que Dios yá está en la tierra, y la labor que Él está haciendo, la cual hemos resumido en estas páginas.

A rough translation of the above declaration states that:

Jesus Christ (man), Dr. Jose Luis de Jesus Miranda, judge of all, will come to bring judgment to Puerto Rico in order that he could unmask the religious corruption as well as the evil that resides in the religious system, all this while declaring all of the chosen as “just.”

This December 17th the world will be a witness of the second coming of Christ. The king of kings will touch upon the boricuan land. Puerto Rico will be the stage where hundred’s of people will witness “live” while millions will watch through satellite tv the event that will put a mark upon history.

We invite you to corroborate the evidence that God is already on earth and that we have resumed the work that He is doing on these very web pages.

This has an eerie similarity to the past failed Jehovahs Witness’ prophecies. As Matt Slick from Carm.org points out, all of these were declarations of similar second comings and judgments that really left the Watchtower organization in shame:

1897 “Our Lord, the appointed King, is now present, since October 1874,” Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 4, page 621.

1899 “…the ‘battle of the great day of God Almighty’ (Revelation 16:14), which will end in A.D. 1914 with the complete overthrow of earth’s present rulership, is already commenced.” The Time Is at Hand, page 101 (1908 edition).

1916 “The Bible chronology herein presented shows that the six great 1000 year days beginning with Adam are ended, and that the great 7th Day, the 1000 years of Christ’s Reign, began in 1873.” The Time Is at Hand, page ii, (forward).

1918 “Therefore we may confidently expect that 1925 will mark the return of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the faithful prophets of old, particularly those named by the Apostle in Hebrews 11, to the condition of human perfection.” Millions Now Living Will Never Die, page 89.

1922 “The date 1925 is even more distinctly indicated by the Scriptures than 1914.” The Watchtower 9/1/22, page 262.

1923 “Our thought is, that 1925 is definitely settled by the Scriptures. As to Noah, the Christian now has much more upon which to base his faith than Noah had upon which to base his faith in a coming deluge.” The Watchtower, page 106 4/1/23.

1925 “The year 1925 is here. With great expectation Christians have looked forward to this year. Many have confidently expected that all members of the body of Christ will be changed to heavenly glory during this year. This may be accomplished. It may not be. In his own due time God will accomplish his purposes concerning his people. Christians should not be so deeply concerned about what may transpire this year.” The Watchtower, 1/1/25, page. 3.

1925 “It is to be expected that Satan will try to inject into the minds of the consecrated, the thought that 1925 should see an end to the work.” The Watchtower, Sept, 1925 page 262.

1926 “Some anticipated that the work would end in 1925, but the Lord did not state so. The difficulty was that the friends inflated their imaginations beyond reason; and that when their imaginations burst asunder, they were inclined to throw away everything.” The Watchtower, page 232.

1931 “There was a measure of disappointment on the part of Jehovah’s faithful ones on earth concerning the years 1917, 1918, and 1925, which disappointment lasted for a time…and they also learned to quit fixing dates.” Vindication, page 338.

1941 “Receiving the gift, the marching children clasped it to them, not a toy or plaything for idle pleasure, but the Lord’s provided instrument for most effective work in the remaining months before Armageddon.” The Watchtower, 9/15/41, page 288.

1968 “True, there have been those in times past who predicted an ‘end to the world’, even announcing a specific date. Yet nothing happened. The ‘end’ did not come. They were guilty of false prophesying. Why? What was missing?.. Missing from such people were God’s truths and evidence that he was using and guiding them.” Awake, 10/8/68.

1968 “Why are you looking forward to 1975?” The Watchtower, 8/15/68, page 494.

However, Jose Luis de Jesus saved himself from risking total humiliation with erratic second coming predictions and “just appeared” without anyone really knowing. Nevertheless, he did set a day for judgment and It will be Dec. 17th of 2006. As you can see, he literally ran with the marketing slogan “every eye will see” and set out a press release to all of the news outlets for his world judgment.

While the seriousness of this cult cannot be ignored it occurred to me that he acts and talks and even has mannerisms similar to a latino icon that sort of paved away to this whole predicting the future, giving into mystical and esoteric revelations nonsense: None other than Walter Mercado. Just look at these pictures below and read here and you could almost swear that Walter could of acted as a sort of John the Baptist to this guy. Why, with all of the syncretistic tendencies in many of the spanish speaking evangelical countries, it is no wonder how people like Walter and Jose Luis de Jesus can influence so many bible believing Christians.

Remember, and I especially plead to all of my spanish speaking readers: These are some of the aberrations he teaches that are contrary to the Scriptures themselves:

1. Preexistence - according to their understanding of Hebrews 12:9 and Jeremiah 1:9

2. We were evangelized in Heaven - Rev. 13:8

3. We were incarnated while sent to earth

4. Adam was really the serpent of the book of Genesis

5. The apostle Jose Luis de Jesus was sent to earth so that he could believe, learn and explain the mysteries of God

6. This same apostle is the one whom the apostle Paul talked about in 1 Cor. 3:10

7. And of course, every cult’s favorite: NO TRINITY

Español: Por favor les imploro de que oren por esta secta para que Dios abra los ojos de miles de personas que estan siendo enganados por el enemigo de nuestras almas. Visiten al Centro de Investigaciones Religiosas y bajen los siguientes articulos que descubren la verdad sobre la secta de Jose Luis de Jesus:

• Ministerio Creciendo en Gracia y sus extrañas doctrinas — AC-041
• ¿Un nuevo apóstol para los gentiles? — AC-042
• Creciendo en Gracia y la superioridad del Apóstol Pablo — AC043
• Los dos “cristosâ€� de Creciendo en Gracia — AC-044

Digg It!

3 comments.

Cults Watch | Creciendo en Gracia Interviews

"Ever since that day, I can't learn from anybody and I mean no one," De Jesús recently told Miami New Times, a weekly South Florida newspaper.

Faith News Network/February 27, 2006
By J. Lee Grady

Puerto Rican preacher José Luis De Jesús Miranda says a wondrous thing happened to him in 1976 when he was living in Massachusetts. He claims that two heavenly beings took him to a marble hall where an apparition merged with his body and began to speak inside of him. De Jesus believes that he and Jesus Christ became one and the same in that instant.

"Ever since that day, I can't learn from anybody and I mean no one," De Jesús recently told Miami New Times, a weekly South Florida newspaper.

The voice inside De Jesús' head later told him to move to Miami, where he founded his controversial Creciendo en Gracia (Growing in Grace) church along with a TV studio. He attracts a relatively small following in Miami, only 500 members, but the group has spawned 300 additional congregations with 100,000 members, mostly in Latin countries. Meanwhile his TV program reportedly reaches 2 million.

De Jesús sounds like another David Koresh in the making.

All his followers call him Daddy. Many of them wear T-shirts with De Jesús' face and a bold slogan, "GOD HAS COME." Their cars are adorned with license plates that say: "Creciendo en Gracia: The Government of the Kingdom of God." De Jesus began calling himself El Otro (The Other) in 1999, and then in 2004 he announced that he is Jesus Christ.

His doctrines are bizarre. He tells his followers they can live any way they want to because sin doesn't exist and the devil is dead. He also teaches that Christian churches are led by "ministers of Satan," and he encourages members of his organization to stage protests at church services and Christian events. Creciendo en Gracia members are encouraged to scream at people and carry placard with messages such as "THE DEVIL WAS DESTROYED."

According to New Times reporter Mariah Blake, such protests have grabbed headlines in Miami and throughout Latin America. In Colombia, for example, De Jesús' followers recently staged simultaneous protests in 22 cities.

De Jesús does not hide his intentions. "My purpose is to close down every church so the true church can begin," he told the Miami paper. "You could say I'm leading the greatest reformation that has ever happened."

I guess you could say that. Or you could say that another deceiver is on the loose and this one is targeting the Spanish-speaking world.

De Jesús fits the classic profile of an egotistical religious con man. He lives in a mansion, drives a BMW, wears lots of diamonds and spends $300,000 a year on bodyguards. Meanwhile many of his staff volunteer their time and give up to 80 percent of their income to the church.

One member of Creciendo en Gracia, Miami businessman Alvaro Albarracin, told New Times that his Internet company was divinely blessed because he gave $12,000 a month to the church. After making millions he sold the business to work for De Jesús. Now he buys and sells businesses and gives all the proceeds to the group.

Albarracin said: "I wanted to devote my life to Dad. I truly believe he's my God, my Creator."

The newspaper also reported that Albarracin's involvement in the cult triggered a breakup with his first wife. Interestingly, De Jesús left his own wife in 1999, and he later married a Colombian woman he was living with.

What is most alarming about Creciendo en Gracia is the level of blind loyalty his followers display. The group's Web site proclaims: "We are going to shut the mouths of those dogs [speaking of Christian churches.] We are ready to give our lives for this!"

Sounds vaguely like what the Branch Davidians said of Koresh.

Even though there are unconfirmed reports that a protest in Colombia last December resulted in a stabbing, De Jesús insists that his church is nonviolent. Yet the leader of this bizarre sect also claims that his church will one day rule the world.

and Part 2

For more information on this please download this precise and well dcoumented article (spanish) by Ricardo Becerra from Centro de Investigaciones Religiosas (CIR).

http://www.defensadelafe.org/assets/AC/AC-041.pdf

Digg It!

2 comments.

Thomist Spotlight | Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P. (1877-1964)

Who is Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P? 

Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P.

Nacido en 1877 en Auch, Francia. Su tío, el padre La Grange, era un famoso biblista.
Estudió medicina por dos años en la Universidad de Bordeaux. Siendo estudiante de medicina, ingresó a la Orden de los Predicadores (dominicos). Estudió filosofía en la Sorbonne. En esos años era bastante inusual para los dominicos seguir estudios de filosofía en una Universidad secular. Pero esta posibilidad, le permitió participar en las clases de notables filósofos franceses de ese tiempo, como es el caso de Henri Bergson. 

Posteriormente, se avocó a la teología en su orden en la escuela de Le Saulchoir, bajo la dirección de Ambroise Gardeil quien se encontraba explorando la psicología del misticismo.  También estudió con Emmanuel-Louis (Antonin) Lemmonyer (fallecido en 1932) fundador, con A.M. Jacquin, de la Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques (1907) y, con M. Barge, de la Revue de la Jeunesse para los jóvenes (1909). El padre Lemmonyer, que fue sucesor de Gardeil como regente de Le Saulchoir y que sirvió como asistente del maestro Gillet, trabajó especialmente contra la separación de la teología moral de la teología mística y ascética. Conoció personalmente a Bergson, a Levy-Bruhl y a Maritain.
Fue profesor en la escuela de los dominicos en La Saulchoir, Bélgica (1905-1909), y después en el Ateneo Angelicum (posteriormente, Pontificia Universidad Romana de Santo Tomás) de 1909 a 1960. Fue profesor de muchos notables intelectuales católicos de este siglo, entre otros de M.-D. Chenu, O.P., y de Karol Wojtyla, futuro Juan Pablo II, de quienes fue consultor y supervisor de tesis. Sólo abandonó el Angelicum un año y durante sus vacaciones, que aprovechaba para predicar en Italia, Francia, Inglaterra, Holanda, Canadá y América del Sur.

Miembro de la Academia Pontificia Romana de Santo Tomás de Aquino, cuarta generación.

Fue un escritor prolífico en temas filosóficos, teológicos y espirituales. Su bibliografía completa lista más de 770 libros, artículos y correcciones. 

Se hizo notorio con sus primeras obras en las que atacó una por una las tesis del Modernismo. Fue consultor del Santo Oficio y de otras congregaciones romanas. Estas tareas le ganaron fama de "inquisidor" e inflexible, muchos le adjudican la paternidad de la Encíclica Humani Generis en la que Pío XII condenó la Nouvelle Theologie y la extravagancias del padre jesuita Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. 

Filosóficamente, se afilió al tomismo más tradicional defendiendo las famosas 24 tesis y la distinción real entre esencia y existencia. Estudió especialmente a los representantes de la tradición tomista: el cardenal Cayetano, Domingo Bañez y Juan de Santo Tomás, cuyos trabajos comentó. Por esta visión doctrinal, no se encontraba a gusto entre los estudiosos que se limitaban a un análisis puramente histórico y exegético de Santo Tomás, sino que buscaba la aplicación del tomismo a los problemas del siglo XX.

Durante un tiempo, fue director espiritual de Jacques y Raissa Maritain. Se opuso a algunas tesis sostenidas por su antiguo dirigido y sus seguidores, especialmente en temas de filosofía práctica. Notable fue el intercambio de correspondencia entre ambos durante la Guerra Civil española: de acuerdo con el dominico, la causa de los nacionalistas era la de la Iglesia; algo más prudente, Maritain sostenía un cierto recelo ante quien era apoyado por los regímenes totalitarios de Alemania e Italia.

En teología, se distinguió por sus estudios de espiritualidad, entre ellos: Las Tres Edades de la Vida Interior. Intentó armonizar las enseñanzas espirituales de San Juan de la Cruz con los principios de Santo Tomás.

Doctrinariamente fue algo estricto, pero siempre fue un religioso profundo, protector de los pobres y director espiritual de muchos. Por su piedad y erudicción, durante toda su vida fue renombrado.

Después del Concilio Vaticano II, sufrió fuertes críticas e, incluso, el desprecio de muchos por sus argumentos en contra de las innovaciones teológicas de mediados del siglo XX y su firme apoyo de Franco durante la guerra interna española. Sin embargo, en muchos aspectos fue realmente un innovador. Por otro lado, hoy en día, aquietados los ánimos del período postconciliar, muchas de sus críticas han resultado acertadas. 

Autor de muchos libros y artículos, como ya se dijo, entre ellos se destacan: Le Sens Commun (1909), Dieu: Son Existence et sa Nature (París, 1923, 2 vols.), La Synthèse Thomiste (1946), Dieu (1950), Le Réalisme du principe de finalité, Vida Eterna, La Madre del Salvador y Nuestra Vida Interior, Nuestro Salvador y Su Amor por Nosotros, Predestination, Providence, Las Virtudes Teologales I: Sobre la Fe, Tres Vías de la Vida Espiritual, Perfección Cristiana y Contemplación. A esto hay que agregar su comentario a la Summa consistente de siete volúmenes excelentes. Fue colaborador en la Revue de Science Philosophie et Théologie y en la Revue Thomiste.

En 1964 debido a su decadente salud se retiró al convento de Santa Sabina en Roma donde falleció ese mismo año.

Digg It!

1 comment.

Legal Protection for Immigrants

Even though I dont agree with everything Southern Poverty Law’s protects in the name of “tolerance” kudos for them for standing up for our hard workers.

Digg It!

no comments yet.