What the church needs now, is love, sweet love…

No amount of theological enquiry, seminars or admonition could get one over the starboard bow like media can - and funny media at that. These two videos pretty much describe the state of the prosperity crowd now a days, including those meddling is soft porn prospertiy gospel.

AND

No Tag

International Conference on Natural Theology | Beyond Paley: Renewing the vision for Natural Theology

International Conference on Natural Theology
 
Beyond Paley: Renewing the vision for Natural Theology
 
23-25 June 2008, Museum of Natural History, 
Oxford University

A major international conference on natural theology will be held at Oxford University from 23 – 25 June 2008, entitled “Beyond Paley: Renewing the Vision for Natural Theology”. The conference will review every aspect of the question of whether the divine can be known through nature, aiming to stimulate discussion of the scientific, theological, historical, philosophical and broader cultural aspects of this important issue.

The conference is named after William Paley (1743-1805), whose celebrated Natural Theology (1801) is widely regarded as one of the most important historical statements of this approach. It is clear that the approach stands in need of substantial renewal and redirection, in the light of the many scientific, philosophical and theological criticisms directed against it. The conference will aim to craft new approaches in the light of developments since then.

This conference, in addition to reviewing past approaches, will seek to chart some new directions for natural theology, especially in the light of recent scientific exploration of so-called “anthropic” phenomena. There is considerable interest in these questions at every level of the academic world, as well as in the media. This conference is likely to attract much attention from the media and academy, and is certain to catalyse further discussion for years to come.

This conference will be held in the Oxford University Museum of Natural History, designed by John Ruskin. Appropriately enough, at one stage it was proposed to name this building the “Museum of Natural Theology”. This magnificent neo-Gothic Grade I listed building contains scientific collections gathered over a period of three centuries. It was opened in 1860, and is widely regarded as one of the finest of its kind. The Museum includes a state of the art lecture theatre, fully equipped for digital presentations. Accommodation will be at St Anne’s College, close to the conference venue, but conference delegates are welcome to make their own arrangements with local hotels and guest houses.

We are negotiating to see if it may be possible for conference delegates to view the room (no longer open to the public) in which Samuel Wilberforce and Thomas Huxley debated Darwin's Origin of Species during the 1860 meeting of the British Association.

Confirmed speakers and topics include:

Dr Justin Barrett, Senior Director of the Centre for Anthropology and Mind, Oxford University. His publications include Why Would Anyone Believe in God? (AltaMira, 2004), described by Pascal Boyer as “a brilliant and challenging presentation of the cognitive study of religion, by a psychologist who practically invented the field.” Dr Barrett will explore the relevance of the emerging field of the cognitive science of religion for natural theology.

Topic: How “natural” is natural theology?

Jeremy Begbie, Professor of Theology at the University of St Andrews, Scotland, and Associate Principal of Ridley Hall, Cambridge. Professor Begbie’s research interests are principally in the interplay between theology and the arts. His publications in this field include Voicing Creation’s Praise: Towards a Theology of the Arts (T&  Clark, 1991) and Theology, Music and Time (Cambridge University Press, 2000).

Topic: Natural theology and the arts.

John Hedley Brooke, formerly Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion, Oxford University, and presently Fellow of the Institute of Advanced Studies, Durham University. Professor Brooke has a long-standing interest in the development of natural theology. His publications include the prize-winning book, Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 1991), and more recently, Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science & Religion, co-edited with Ian Maclean (Oxford University Press, 2005).

Topic: The historical development of British natural theology.

Simon Conway Morris, FRS, Professor of Evolutionary Palaeobiology at the University of Cambridge. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society aged 39, was awarded the Walcott Medal of the National Academy of Sciences in 1987, and the Lyell Medal of the Geological Society of London in 1998. His publications include The Crucible of Creation (Oxford University Press, 1998) and Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in an Lonely Universe (Cambridge University Press, 2003). His 2007 Gifford Lecture at the University of Edinburgh was entitled “Darwin's Compass: How Evolution Discovers the Song of Creation”.

Topic: New developments in evolutionary biology and the redirection of natural theology.

Hilary Fraser, Geoffrey Tillotson Professor in Nineteenth-Century Studies, and Head of School, English & Humanities, Birkbeck College, University of London. In her Beauty and Belief: Aesthetics and Religion in Victorian Literature (Cambridge University Press, 1986), Dr Fraser explored the link between natural beauty and religion, a theme which she will develop in this conference address with particular reference to natural theology in the writings of John Ruskin and Gerard Manley Hopkins. Her more recent publications include The Victorians and Renaissance Italy (Blackwell, 1992), and English Prose of the Nineteenth Century (Longmans,1997).

Topic: Natural beauty and natural theology in Nineteenth Century Writers

Peter Harrison, Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion, Oxford University. He has published extensively in the area of cultural and intellectual history with a focus on the philosophical, scientific and religious thought of the early modern period. His publications include 'Religion' and the Religions in the English Enlightenment ( Cambridge University Press, 1990) and The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science (Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Topic: Reading the “Book of Nature” in the Early Modern Period

John Haught, Landegger Distinguished Professor of Theology at Georgetown University, Washington, DC. He was the winner of the 2002 Owen Garrigan Award in Science and Religion. He has written extensively on the importance of Darwinism for Christian theology, including God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution (Westview Press, 2000), and Deeper Than Darwin: The Prospect for Religion in the Age of Evolution (Westview Press, 2003).

Topic: The Challenges of Darwinism for Natural Theology

Alister McGrath, Professor of Historical Theology, Oxford University. Dr McGrath has a special interest in the relation of the natural sciences and Christian theology. His recent publications include A Scientific Theology (3 vols, T&T Clark, 2001-3) and the forthcoming The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology (Blackwell, 2008). He will deliver the Gifford Lectures at the University of Aberdeen in 2009 on the theme of the place of anthropic reasoning in contemporary natural theology.

Topic: The theological basis of natural theology

Richard Swinburne, FBA,  Emeritus Nolloth Professor of the Philosophy of the Christian Religion, University of Oxford. Dr Swinburne is one of the best-known and most widely read contemporary philosophers of religion. His recent publications include new editions of his Faith and Reason (Clarendon Press, 2005) and The Existence of God (Clarendon Press, 2004). He has dealt with natural theology at many points in his writings.

Topic: Natural theology: the current state of the debate within philosophy of religion.

Keith Ward, FBA, Gresham Professor of Divinity, Gresham College, London, and formerly Regius Professor of Divinity, Oxford University. Dr Ward has written extensively in this field, especially in relation to the interface of science and religion. His works include God, Chance and Necessity (Oneworld, 1996)and Pascal’s Fire: Scientific Faith and Religious Understanding (Oneworld, 2006).

Topic: The Arthur Peacocke memorial lecture: the future for natural theology. [This lecture will be open to the public, and will take place in the University Church of St Mary the Virgin, Oxford].

Other speakers are being approached. A conference brochure is in preparation, which will be published in various formats, including a version to be distributed on the web.

Applications will be received from 1 January 2008.

Call for papers:

Papers are invited for presentation at the conference and publication on the web site. These should be limited to 15 minute oral presentations, although longer versions of the paper can be posted on the website. Applications should be received by 15 November 2007; decisions will be notified to the e-mail address supplied by 1 January 2008. We particularly encourage submission of papers in the following broad areas, although other areas are also welcome:

The history of natural theology

The philosophical foundations of natural theology

The place of the natural sciences in natural theology

The theological evaluation of natural theology

Applications should take the following form: A 200-300 word description of the topic to be addressed, including your assessment of its significance; a brief curriculum vitae (no more than a single side) including publications relevant to your proposed topic; and an e-mail address that will be active up to the time of the conference itself. Please submit applications as a Word attachment by e-mail, marking the message “Proposed Paper for Oxford Natural Theology Conference” to the convenor, Professor Alister McGrath, at the following address:

Alister.McGrath@hmc.ox.ac.uk

Bursaries

We will be offering a limited number of student bursaries to promising graduates who might wish to develop research in this area, and will provide further details of this shortly. These bursaries will cover the conference fee but not accommodation costs.

You are welcome to circulate this updated notice to anyone who might be interested in attending this conference.

Alister E. McGrath, Convenor
Professor of Historical Theology, Oxford University

Last updated: 24 September 2007

No Tag

1 comment.

Prosperity Secret!!! Please Click on the Mp3 and Listen on How YOU can Prosper!!!

The astute and discerning folks over at Apologetics.com have made this available through their site. It is a great analysis of the Propserity/Positve/Osteenish type ideas that are floating around as "gospel." This is especially relevant after the the Joel Osteen interview with Larry King (transcript found here).

 

Enjoy!

No Tag

Excerpt: Third Article: Whether In Christ There Was Faith

Posted on September 15, 2007 by David Mendez.
Categories: Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, Thomism, Religion, Apologetics, Theology.

CHRIST THE SAVIOR

Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange

A Study of the Third Part of The Summa Theologica

of St. Thomas Aquinas

The general opinion of theologians is that Christ did not have faith. Such is theopinion of St. Thomas. The reason given in the counterargument does not absolutely prove this assertion, for the words of Peter quoted here, namely, “Thou knowest all things,”[880] were spoken after Christ’s resurrection. Hence these words prove to some extent that at least after the resurrection Jesus did not have faith concerning mysteries in the strict sense, but the beatific vision.217 

The body of the article presupposes what must be proved farther on,[881] namely, that Christ from the first moment of His conception completely saw God in His essence. But the clear vision of God excludes the notion of faith, which is of things not seen. In other words, a virtue cannot be in a subject to whom its primary act isderogatory. But the primary act of faith refers to God not seen. Therefore Christcould not have had faith, since from the moment of His conception He clearly saw God in His essence. This is the common opinion among theologians. No theologian holds that an act of faith is simultaneously compatible with the beatific vision, because the scriptural text of St. Paul is clear on this point: “Faith[882]… is the evidence of things that appear not.” Durandus thinks that the habit of faith, however, if not its act, can remain in the blessed. Scotus holds this to be possible, but useless. St. Thomas and St. Bonaventure are of the opinion that the habit of faith cannot co-exist with the beatific vision. Thus St. Thomas says: “The object of faith is a divine thing not seen. But the habit of virtue… takes its species from the object. Hence, if we deny that the divine thing was not seen, we exclude the very essence of faith.”[883] 

At least the permanence of the beatific vision excludes both act and habit of faith.The beatific vision as a transient act, which St. Augustine and St. Thomas think St. Paul had on this earth, excludes the act of faith concerning this object, but not the habit of faith. Reply to first objection. The moral virtues, although they are inferior to faith, wereand are always in Christ because they imply no defect as regards their subjectmatter.[884] 

Reply to second objection. St. Thomas does not teach that Christ had the merit of faith, but He had what constitutes the reward of our faith, which is perfect obedience to the loving commands of God. But Christ was faithful to His promises, and this is sometimes called faith in Sacred Scripture.[885] Thus the prophet says of the Messias: “Faith shall be the girdle of His loins.”[886] 

No Tag

Introducing: Societas Scholasticorum

We are an intellectual association commited to restoring the philosophic doctrines, didactic principles, and scientific synthesis of the greatest masters of the medieval universities, the Scholastics.  We hold Thomas of Aquin above all other philosophers as the most perfect Scholastic thinker and we apply ourselves to renewing the great tradition of Thomistic Philosophy forged by his Commentators throughout the centuries.

http://www.societyofscholastics.org/home.html

No Tag

Building Interest In Our Gospel Step By Step In a Non-Defensive Way

Posted on August 18, 2007 by David Mendez.
Categories: Evangelism, Worldviews, Ministry Watch, Religion, Apologetics.
Dear Friends of M&T,
 
Below is a write up of a recent pre-evangelistic encounter that I hope will shed some light on how to engage others spiritually without making them defensive. It also suggests some ways to build future pre-evangelistic bridges based on current interaction with others. My prayer is that it might stimulate your thinking in the area or pre-evangelism.
 
Blessings,
 
Dr. Dave Geisler
 
 A few days ago I was working out in the exercise room at our apartment complex and a young Chinese guy (in his late 20’s) came in and started working out on the treadmill right next to the one I was on. Let’s just call him Raymond (that is not his real name). After about 10 minutes, Raymond was huffing and puffing and instinctively I looked over at him and said to him “If you think it is tough now, wait till you are my age.” That seemed to pique his interest to engage me in a conversation. I explained to him that up until I turned thirty, it wasn’t so difficult for me to “stay in shape” but when I got into my mid 30s it started getting more difficult and then when I turned 40, it was as though I hit a brick wall! That led to other conversations such as where he worked, what he did for a living, and etc. I told him that both my wife (who was a Singaporean) and I were teachers, she at NTU and me at East Asia School of Theology.
 
I realized that at this point I could have tried to engage him in a spiritual discussion since I mentioned that I was teaching at a seminary. However I realized this seemed a little too soon and abrupt and could make him defensive right away. He told me that he just started working out and since I am now in the exercise room almost every day, I knew I would bump into him again. As a result, I decided to wait for another opportunity to lay a plank in building my spiritual bridge. A few minutes later such an opportunity arose when I laid the ground work by telling him that my wife and I had moved to Singapore three years ago and shared with him some of the things I really liked about Singapore. This provided the platform for me to say “As a parent it is especially nice to know that when my daughter becomes a teenager I can feel confident she would be safe walking down almost any street in Singapore.” I told him that I could not say the same thing in my country, the U.S. (this was designed to set up what I was going to say next to engage him in spiritual dialog).
 
I said, “I don’t know if you know much about the religious history of the U.S. but  about 30 - 40 years ago the youth started rejecting belief in God. Now the problem is that once you have given up believing in God, you lose any foundation for believing in any kind of morality and each person does what he or she thinks is right.” I further said that “This has led to more and more moral decay in the U.S. society”. Then I asked him “Have you ever heard of a Christian writer named C.S. Lewis?” He replied that he did. I said that C.S. Lewis was an atheist who finally realized that without the existence of God there was no basis for saying that something was either right or wrong. I explained further that one day C.S. Lewis realized however that his argument against God was actually an argument for God! I told him that initially C.S. Lewis had difficulty believing in the Christian God when there was so much injustice in the world until one day he realized the flaw in his argument. He asked himself “How could I know that something was unjust unless I had some kind of standard of justice to measure the injustice by.” Furthermore he concluded, “How could I know that something was ultimately unjust unless I had an ultimate standard of justice in which I was measuring the injustice by?” So in reality C.S. Lewis discovered that his argument against God was actually an argument for God! Certainly this seemed to pique his interest. About a minute later he confessed to me that he has a friend who gave him a book that answers some of the questions people have about the Christian faith. (It was interesting that he would volunteer this info. and seem to suggest to me that he was potential open for further spiritual interactions). So from all of this I knew then he had a Christian friend in his past who tried to help him better understand the Christian faith. At this point we were both at the end of our workout routine and I could see that I had given him much to chew on for a while until our next encounter so I did not seek to engage him in further spiritual dialog. When you are engaging someone spiritually and you sense you are only going to get so far in one conversation, sometimes it is better for you to pull the plug on the spiritual part of the conversation first.
That way the other person doesn’t feel “pressurized” to buy what you are selling and it helps to keep the door open for further discussion.
 
Next time I see “Raymond” I will try to pick up from where I left off and say to him something like, “Oh I remember last time we talked you mentioned that a friend gave you a Christian book for you to read. I am curious, was there any particular reason that he gave you that book?” Was there any questions or issues you were trying to resolve in your own mind? By asking these two questions I am trying to discern what his major barriers to the gospel might be. This is an example of a follow-up question I would ask next. Hopefully I’ve laid some ground work that might make it easier for him to want to continue the spiritual dialog in our next conversation (1 Cor. 3:6).

No Tag

THE APOLOGETICS STUDY BIBLE

About the ASB

The Apologetics Study Bible will help today’s Christian better understand, defend and proclaim their beliefs in this age of increasing moral and spiritual relativism.

More than 100 hundred key articles are placed throughout the volume relating the truth of the Bible to disciplines such as science, history, and philosophy. This dynamic feature prompts a rewarding experience at every reading. Highlights of this new thinking person’s edition of God’s Word include the full text of the Holman CSB® translation, an introduction focusing on relevant apologetics issues, and profiles of historic Christian apologists from Justin Martyr to C.S. Lewis.

Also featured are valuable contributions from a who’s-who of modern apologists such as Chuck Colson, Norm Geisler, Hank Hanegraaff, Josh McDowell, William Lane Craig, JP Moreland, Ravi Zacharias, and 90+ more. Plus a special lead article from best-selling author Lee Strobel on “How Apologetics changed my life” (books by Lee include The Case for Christ, The Case for Faith, The Case for a Creator, and many more).

The Apologetics Study Bible—coming in October 2007

No Tag

2 comments.